<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discouraging world of a designer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designkai.com/discouraging-world-of-a-designer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designkai.com/discouraging-world-of-a-designer/</link>
	<description>For the Designer that loves a rant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenico</title>
		<link>http://designkai.com/discouraging-world-of-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designkai.com/?p=9#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike,
With that quote I was referring more specifically to giving negative feedback, particularly of the constructive variety. Constructive negative feedback is often not particularly constructive from people who are unfamiliar or self proclaimed to the design industry, this is simply because most people don&#039;t see the nit picky details that cause the problems. To rephrase it, they see the design as an image rather then many small images put together in a way where they wont be destroying each other. They can see that there is a problem, yes, but it is unlikely that if it is subtle enough they will be able to name the problem at all, or more importantly, name it correctly. And anything that isn&#039;t too subtle for others can probably be picked up by your own eye.

There is benefit in the untrained eye, but I don&#039;t particularly feel as though it is as constructive or deep as feedback from the trained eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike,<br />
With that quote I was referring more specifically to giving negative feedback, particularly of the constructive variety. Constructive negative feedback is often not particularly constructive from people who are unfamiliar or self proclaimed to the design industry, this is simply because most people don&#8217;t see the nit picky details that cause the problems. To rephrase it, they see the design as an image rather then many small images put together in a way where they wont be destroying each other. They can see that there is a problem, yes, but it is unlikely that if it is subtle enough they will be able to name the problem at all, or more importantly, name it correctly. And anything that isn&#8217;t too subtle for others can probably be picked up by your own eye.</p>
<p>There is benefit in the untrained eye, but I don&#8217;t particularly feel as though it is as constructive or deep as feedback from the trained eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P.</title>
		<link>http://designkai.com/discouraging-world-of-a-designer/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designkai.com/?p=9#comment-114</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re pretty much spot-on on everything, however, I must disagree with you on one point. &quot;[...] unless you&#039;re a designer, you probably aren&#039;t in any position to give feedback that[&#039;]s useful.&quot; Actually, that&#039;s the most important feedback, as that&#039;s who it&#039;s for, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re pretty much spot-on on everything, however, I must disagree with you on one point. &#8220;[...] unless you&#8217;re a designer, you probably aren&#8217;t in any position to give feedback that[']s useful.&#8221; Actually, that&#8217;s the most important feedback, as that&#8217;s who it&#8217;s for, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
